Deleuze's Philosophy of Law

Laurent de Sutter
Translated by Nils F. Schott

Paperback
£20.99
Hardback
£90.00
Ebook (app) i
£20.99
Ebook (PDF) i
£20.99
 
Aggregates and assesses Deleuze’s claims about law, decision, judgement and related themes for the first time
  • Develops a complete and self-sustaining Deleuzian philosophy of law where others have found only fragmentation
  • Examines and uses various interdisciplinary connections, including law and literature, law and political theory, law and metaphysics, law and history of philosophy, and legal history
  • Critiques several approaches to the question of Deleuze’s legal thought
  • Promises to ignite debate and draw attention to the importance of legal theory for other fields, including social and political philosophy
  • Gilles Deleuze has provided the most fascinating account of law of the 20th century. Yet it is hidden in a just a few clues dispersed throughout his work and no complete reconstruction of it has ever been produced before. Laurent de Sutter gathers all the elements that compose Deleuze’s philosophy of law and articulates them for the first time in a real system.

    The result is the most devastating critique of the very idea of law. But it is also surprising, praising the actual practice of jurisprudence. This is not simply a practice of judgment; it is a practice of radical creation and leads to an intriguing question: what if lawyers were the only true revolutionaries of our time?

Preface to the English Edition

  1. Reconstruction
  2. Use
  3. System
  4. Tradition
  5. Coherence
  6. Language

Introduction

  1. Philosophy
  2. Law
  3. Problem
  4. Alternative
  5. Literalness
  6. Betrayal

1. Critique

  1. Thesis I
  2. Taxonomy
  3. Plato
  4. Socrates
  5. Kant I
  6. Kant II
  7. Freud
  8. Sade I
  9. Sade II
  10. Ost
  11. Sacher-Masoch I
  12. Sacher-Masoch II
  13. Lacan
  14. Kant III
  15. Irony I
  16. Irony II
  17. Humour I
  18. Humour II
  19. Satire
  20. Kafka I
  21. Kafka II
  22. Kafka III
  23. Kafka IV
  24. Kafka V
  25. Cacciari
  26. Bartleby I
  27. Bartleby II
  28. Bartleby III
  29. Agamben
  30. Zourabichvili
  31. Exfoliation, invagination
  32. Critique I
  33. Critique II
  34. The Law
  35. Daddy–Mommy
  36. Young girls

2. Clinic

  1. Thesis II
  2. Discipline
  3. Control
  4. Crisis
  5. Clinic
  6. Axiomatics
  7. Code
  8. Problem
  9. Legalism
  10. Intervention
  11. Diagram
  12. Naturalism I
  13. Naturalism II
  14. Subvention
  15. Tarde
  16. Composition
  17. Consensualism
  18. Convention
  19. Property
  20. Institutionalism
  21. Invention
  22. Legislation
  23. Practice
  24. Logos
  25. Nomos
  26. Schmitt
  27. Law
  28. Topic
  29. Association
  30. Case I
  31. Case II
  32. Jurisprudence
  33. Principles
  34. Leibniz
  35. Rome
  36. Existence

Conclusion

  1. Personae
  2. Judgement
  3. Errors
  4. Continuations
  5. Politics
  6. Deception

Appendices

1. The Young Girls in Deleuze’s Philosophy of Law

  1. Precursor
  2. Surface
  3. Interiority
  4. Perturbation
  5. Disturbance
  6. Tekhnē
  7. Obscenity
  8. Phantasm I
  9. Phantasm II
  10. Viewer
  11. Image
  12. Outside
  13. Philosophy
  14. Pornology
  15. Theorems

2. On Some Interpretations of Deleuze’s Philosophy of Law

  1. Habit
  2. Boundas I
  3. Boundas II
  4. Politics
  5. Lefebvre I
  6. Lefebvre II
  7. Mussawir I
  8. Mussawir II

BibliographyIndex

Is this the book Deleuze would have written had he followed his fantasy of doing law instead of philosophy? Perhaps. In any case, the book written by de Sutter is an infinitely inviting book: it is a slow whispering between two thinkers, a communion of minds and words into which we are called to eavesdrop. It is critical (of law, of the world) and clinical (pragmatic, forensic, focussed) at the same time, performatively showing how critique of law is the necessary condition to engage with law. Through bite-size, delectably pithy, nearly twitterable chapters, de Sutter offers some of the deepest and most genre-changing propositions about the law ever encountered, but uttered lightly, with irony and humour, with a levity and flippancy worthy of the law.

Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, The Westminster Law & Theory Lab
Laurent de Sutter is Professor of Legal Theory at Vrije Universiteit Brussel. He is the author of more than twenty books translated into a dozen languages. In English, he is the author of Narcocapitalism: Life in the Age of Anaesthesia (Polity, 2017) and After Law (Polity, 2020, French Voices Award, Leopold Rosy Prize of the Belgian Royal Academy). He is the editor of the Theory Redux series at Polity Press and of Perspectives Critiques at Presses Universitaires de France.

Nils F. Schott is an academic translator and editor.
With Alexandre Lefebvre, he is the co-editor of three books: Henri Bergson’s lectures on Freedom at the Collège de France (Bloomsbury, 2024); a collection of essays, Interpreting Bergson: Critical Essays (Cambridge University Press, 2019); and a translation of Vladimir Jankélévitch’s Henri Bergson (Duke University Press, 2015). With Hent de Vries, he edited Love and Forgiveness for a More Just World (Columbia University Press, 2015).
He has translated more than twenty books in philosophy and related fields, including, for Edinburgh University Press, Deleuze's Philosophy of Law by Laurent de Sutter.



Recommend to your Librarian

Also in this series

You might also like ...