Ambiguous Cinema

From Simone de Beauvoir to Feminist Film-Phenomenology

Kelli Fuery

Paperback
$29.95
Hardback
$120.00
Ebook (ePub) i
$110.00
Ebook (PDF) i
$120.00
 

Utilises women’s independent cinema to explore Simone de Beauvoir’s notion of ambiguity in film experience

  • Contributes to the growing field of feminist film-phenomenology
  • Foregrounds Simone de Beauvoir’s concept of ambiguity within women’s cinema as a means to think through turbulent emotional experience
  • Uses key feminist phenomenologies to consider independent women’s cinema
  • Puts Beauvoir’s ideas into conversation with contemporary women phenomenologists showing the range and reach of her ideas for film-philosophy
  • Includes diverse examples of films and filmmakers

Simone de Beauvoir’s notion of ambiguity became a cornerstone of her philosophy and influenced a radical rethinking of freedom well into the twenty-first century. In Ambiguous Cinema, Fuery examines Beauvoir’s notion of ambiguity in relation to film experience, exploring both the legacies and limits of her existentialist ethics through a range of films by independent women filmmakers, including Joanna Hogg, Liliana Cavani, Debra Granik, Cheryl Dunye, Claire Denis, Lucrecia Martel, Lynne Ramsay and Céline Sciamma.

Show more

Preface

  1. Beauvoir’s Ambiguity, Cinema and Feminist Phenomenology
  2. Must We Burn Cavani? Moral Ambiguity in The Night Porter
  3. Moments of Moral Choice in Debra Granik’s Leave No Trace
  4. Habit the Cinematic Encounter: Cheryl Dunye and the ‘Dunyementaries’
  5. A New (Ethical) Face on Love: Bad Faith and Claire Denis’s Let the Sunshine In
  6. A Cinema of the Borderlands: Lucrecia Martel’s Zama
  7. Sensuous Co-Performance: Lynne Ramsay’s We Need to Talk About Kevin and Beauvoir’s Aesthetic Attitude
  8. Femme Desire and The Reciprocal Gaze in Céline Sciamma’s Portrait of a Lady on Fire

Conclusion

 

Among the spate of recent books focusing on films as philosophy, Fuery’s Ambiguous Cinema counts as one of the most consistent and compelling. What this reviewer particularly admires about the book is that Fuery, unlike many others who write about film as philosophy, does not limit herself to analyzing film narrative; she also pays close attention to filmic techniques and effects. In addition, she avoids the temptation to make unlikely marriages between filmmakers and a variety of philosophies, and instead provides a template that can be applied widely. A masterful effort! Summing Up: Essential. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty.

W. A. Vincent, CHOICE

Mobilizing Simone de Beauvoir’s writings for cinematic thinking, Fuery brings the diversity and complexity of women’s lived experiences into view in several contemporary feminist films. This is a remarkable contribution to feminist film theory, the first to think film with Beauvoir not just about ideas, but in regard to method.

Prof. Lori Marso, Union College

Quite much more than a mere ‘influence of a philosophy on the cinema,’ Kelli Fuery’s compelling and consequential study actually offers a rich two-way process: films enlivened by complex critical analysis but also the philosophy extended — and productively critiqued, especially around new social identities — by the encounter with moving images.

Dana Polan, New York University

Bring(s) together a substantial body of scholarship on Beauvoir with diverse feminist phenomenological writings and a corpus of rich and complex female-directed films.

Kate Ince, Film-Philosophy
Kelli Fuery is Professor of Creative and Cultural Industries in Wilkinson College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences at Chapman University, California. She is the author of five books, including Ambiguous Cinema: From Simone de Beauvoir to Feminist Film-Phenomenology and Wilfred Bion, Thinking and Emotional Experience with Moving Images. Her next project examines Bion’s notion of the bizarre object and interconnected themes of hallucination, phenomenology and virtuality.

Recommend to your Librarian

Request a Review Copy

You might also like ...